Archive

Posts Tagged ‘IOC’

Dependency Injection Inversion

January 19th, 2010 stiiifff No comments

Seems there is still a lot of confusion about what is Inversion of Control, what is Dependency Injection, what are the differences between the two, and how to apply one or the other properly.

Several people have reacted to a controversial post by Uncle Bob on that topic with, among the most vocal ones, Davy. ;-)

IMHO, some of the best posts on the subject that really make a clear distinction between IoC & DI are the following ones:

The whole point of IoC (forget a minute about DI) is to break the dependencies between your classes and design them as  loosely-coupled as possible (to the point that it’s actually useful of course, it’s not an engineering contest).

All the benefits that you get:

  • Dependency Injection
  • Better testability
  • Better maintainability

are just consequences of the good design of your classes (read about SOLID also).

In the end, it’s just good Object-Oriented design, nothing more. And by good, it doesn’t mean complex, it’s actually quite simple once you got it.

Categories: Castle Project, MEF Tags: , ,

Stepping onto the Bus

October 12th, 2009 stiiifff No comments

I recently had the chance to follow the Advanced Distributed Systems Design with SOA course with Udi Dahan in Brussels, a rejuvenating experience for various reasons : I had no real-world SOA or Messaging Bus experience, it helped me clear out some misunderstandings I had about DDD and also, although painful at first, Udi finger pointed all the bad habits & misconceptions I had accumulated over the years (I can still hear him squeaking “Northwind ! Northwind !“).

So here I am, entering the realm of SOA, EDA & DDD that might well be heaven on earth for both business people & software-makers, the place we all heard of but never saw. But let’s start slowly, and discover my first endeavor with NServiceBus, shall we? :)

For a good introduction on NServiceBus, I suggest you to read the post from Jan who has been doing research on the same aforementioned topics as well.

This post will focus on how well NServiceBus, NHibernate, FluentNHibernate & Castle Framework play together and how to make them fly in a DDD context. Ok, ok, enough talking, show me the code man !!! :D

To manage my NHibernate sessions (ISession), I like to use the Castle’s NHibernate Integration facility, as it gives me a nice abstraction in the form of the ISessionManager component:

ISessionManager

Next to that, a little more than a month ago, the 1.0 version of FluentNHibernate was released, and it’s really neat for both NHibernate configuration & mappings. So, I like to use it as well:

Fluently.Configure(config)
  .Database(MsSqlConfiguration.MsSql2008
    .DefaultSchema("dbo")
    .ConnectionString(c => c
      .FromConnectionStringWithKey("Northwind"))
    .QuerySubstitutions("true 1, false 0")
    .DoNot.UseOuterJoin()
    .ShowSql())
  .Mappings(m => m
    .FluentMappings.AddFromAssemblyOf<CatalogMap>()
    .ExportTo(System.Environment.CurrentDirectory))
  .BuildConfiguration();

One very nice thing about NServiceBus (and its Generic Host) is that it acknowledges from the start that our softwares have to operate in different environments and for that, it offers a very clean solution : Profiles.

Wrapping it all up, wouldn’t it be nice if I could use Castle‘s NHibernate Integration facility for useful components like ISessionManager (and others, more on that later), FluentNHibernate for configuration & mappings and take advantage of NServiceBus Profiles ? Hell yeah !!! Well, that’s actually quite easy & clean. :)

First, configure the NH facility in your config file:

<castle>
  <facilities>
    <facility id="nhibernate.facility" type="Castle.Facilities.NHibernateIntegration.NHibernateFacility, Castle.Facilities.NHibernateIntegration">
      <factory id="nhibernate.factory"/>
    </facility>
  </facilities>
</castle>

Notice that the configuration for the factory is empty … indeed, we want to configure it fluently in the code.

Create a Profile Handler class (implements a IHandleProfile role interface) which simply registers an object into the container (NSB is container-agnostic) :

public class IntegrationProfileHandler : IHandleProfile<Integration>
{
  public void ProfileActivated()
  {
    Configure.Instance.Configurer
      .RegisterSingleton<IConfigurationContributor>(
        new IntegrationNHibernateConfig());
  }
}

… and finally, an implementation of the IConfigurationContributor interface … which is part of Castle‘s NHibernate Integration facility, and will be called before NH‘s SessionFactory is built in order to, well, contribute to the configuration. :)

public class IntegrationNHibernateConfig : IConfigurationContributor
{
  public void Process(string name, Configuration config)
  {
    Fluently.Configure(config)
      .Database(MsSqlConfiguration.MsSql2008
        .DefaultSchema("dbo")
        .ConnectionString(c => c
          .FromConnectionStringWithKey("Northwind"))
        .QuerySubstitutions("true 1, false 0")
        .DoNot.UseOuterJoin()
        .ShowSql())
      .Mappings(m => m
        .FluentMappings.AddFromAssemblyOf<CatalogMap>()
        .ExportTo(System.Environment.CurrentDirectory))
      .BuildConfiguration();
  }
}

Ok, very nice … but I’m not done yet.

A nice concept that we want to use when querying in a true DDD fashion is the notion of Fetching Strategy (read more about it here & there). We need Fetching Strategies for a very simple reason:

Make sure that once we call into the Domain Model to perform a certain action, it has everything it needs to do its job, without causing lazy-loading to trigger and possibly N+1 select problems.

For that matter, I define a simple interface IFetchingStrategy (IEntityRole is just a marker interface):

public interface IFetchingStrategy<TEntityRole>
    where TEntityRole : IEntityRole
{
  string[] FetchList { get; }
}

… that I can then implement to define a fetching strategy per entity role:

public interface IRegisterProductInCatalog : IEntityRole
{
  void RegisterProduct(string category,
         string productName, string productDescription);
}

public class RegisterProductInCatalogStrategy : IFetchingStrategy<IRegisterProductInCatalog>
{
  public string[] FetchList
  {
    get { return new[] { "Categories.Products" }; }
  }
}

Now, it would be nice if I could get an easy access to those fetching strategies … well, that’s what you use an IoC container for ;) Here is the configuration of Castle’s Windsor container in NServiceBus endpoint’s configuration class:

public class EndpointConfig : IConfigureThisEndpoint, AsA_Server, IWantCustomInitialization
{
  public void Init()
  {
    var container = new WindsorContainer(new XmlInterpreter());

    Configure.With()
      .CastleWindsorBuilder(container)
      .XmlSerializer();

    container.Register(
      AllTypes
        .Of(typeof(IFetchingStrategy<>))
        .Pick(Configure.TypesToScan)
        .WithService.FirstInterface()
    );
  }
}

Fluent configuration for the Bus & the Container ! Woohoo, my head is turning ! :D

Now, for the final part, the MessageHandler that makes use of all those cuties & with the help some little extension methods:

public class ProductManager : IHandleMessages<RegisterProductInCatalogRequest>
{
  public virtual IBus Bus { get; set; }
  public virtual ISessionManager SessionManager { get; set; }
  public virtual IFetchingStrategy<IRegisterProductInCatalog> Strategy { get; set; }

  public virtual void Handle(RegisterProductInCatalogRequest message)
  {
    using (var session = SessionManager.OpenSession())
    {
      var catalog =
            session.For<Catalog>(message.CatalogId)
                   .Apply(Strategy)
                   .UniqueResult<IRegisterProductInCatalog>();

      catalog.RegisterProduct(message.CategoryName,
                              message.ProductName,
                              message.ProductDescription);
    }
  }
}

I don’t know you, but that’s the kind of code that makes me happy (like a hippo). :)

Comments, feedback, suggestions are all welcome ! ;)

Castle DynamicProxy Tutorial

July 2nd, 2009 stiiifff No comments

A while ago, Krzysztof Koźmic started a blog post series about Castle Project‘s DynamicProxy (DP2).

If you wanna know what the heck are:

  • Proxies with & without target
  • Interceptors
  • Interceptor selectors

Go read his amazing tutorial. I’m sure you’ll learn something ;)

If needed, have  a quick refresh on AOP : here, there & there.

And if you get inspired by DP2 and the Castle Project in general, follow the evolution & suggest new ideas !

MEF Preview 5 – Recomposition, POCO & Custom Type Systems

April 28th, 2009 stiiifff 3 comments

Go & take the time to read those posts about the latest drop (preview 5) of MEF (Managed Extensibility Framework):

All of this will come for free as part of .Net 4.0 … isn’t that cool or what? :)

Categories: MEF Tags: , , ,

Design principles

January 19th, 2009 stiiifff No comments

Here is a very nice post about the traditional design principles to follow when designing highly-reusable object-oriented class libraries & frameworks:

Design Principles

Update your cheat sheet if you were missing some ;)

Categories: Agile, Patterns Tags: , ,

Dependencies, ownership & lifetime

October 23rd, 2008 stiiifff No comments

A quick post to link Hammett's (creator of Castle Project, Windsor IoC container, and now PM on the MEF project) very interesting article about Dependencies, ownership & lifetime of components.

Dependency Injection is Dead ? Not so sure about that

July 2nd, 2008 stiiifff No comments

Simon Ice has an interesting, although a bit provocative, post on his blog entitled Dependency Injection is Dead.

He's exposing a way to do Dependency Injection using AOP, which is a novel approach but probably has severe limitations in the long run, in terms of predicability & capability compared to what we can expect from good IoC Containers. Read the answers of Nate Kohari and Ayende Rahien, who know what they are talking about. ;)

Categories: Patterns Tags: , ,

CircuitBreaker Interceptor

June 12th, 2008 stiiifff 1 comment

An interesting pattern discussed in Release It!, Design and Deploy Production-Ready Software, is the CircuitBreaker pattern. I was thinking about implementing it in C# but well, as often, someone took care of it already (thus less work for me). :)

Tim Ross has a first post on his blog where he describes the CircuitBreaker and his implementation. In the second part, he introduces several improvements such as a ServiceLevel variable and the possibility to ignore certain exception types.

Although a very nice implementation, I wasn't thinking about a class for my CircuitBreaker implementation … but about an Interceptor.

Indeed, when designing a system built of loosely-coupled components using an IoC container, you will often add interceptors at strategic places (integration points with external systems) to catch failures, log statistics, … So, it makes sense to make the CircuitBreaker an interceptor that can be applied to those critical parts of your application in order to fail-fast in the event of repeated failures & relieve the external system that is under stress.

Here a quick implementation of Tim's class as an interceptor (using Castle Windsor IoC container) … the test code is dumb, but I guess you'll get the point. ;)

CircuitBreakerInterceptor.rar

Note: Instead of porting the whole code into the Interceptor class, it's also possible to simply get a CircuitBreaker object injected by he container into the Interceptor (interceptors are just a special kind of components), and the Interceptor would delegate the invocation call to the CircuitBreaker.

Btw, for those who don’t know Castle Windsor container well yet (never too late to learn something), this small sample also demonstrate the ease of using & configuring the container (as well as creating interceptors).

MEF – Managed Extensibility Framework first CTP just released

June 5th, 2008 stiiifff No comments

The MEF Team has just released its first CTP of the Managed Extensibility Framework.

This is a project to keep an eye on as it will bring Dependency Injection (and much more) right at the heart of the .Net Framework, in a new System.ComponentModel.Composition namespace (still subject to change).

The project page is here. The CTP contains some very nice demos of the early possibilities.

Categories: MEF, Patterns Tags: , ,

Dependency Injection on your WCF & WF services

April 28th, 2008 stiiifff No comments

You are using an Inversion of Control container for your application components and you are exposing some services through WCF. Wouldn’t it be nice if you could host those services in your container and benefit from Dependency Injection ?

Well, that’s easy if you’re using Castle Project‘s Windsor container: just register the WcfIntegration facility and you’re on track:

  • Public properties or Constructor arguments will automatically be injected by the container.
  • Any component registered in the container that implements the IServiceBehavior or IOperationBehavior interfaces will be easily applicable to your WCF services.

Similarly, there is also a Workflow Foundation integration facility that provides the following functionalities:

  • Host the WorkflowRuntime engine in the container, making it available for any workflow-aware components.
  • Automatically add to the WorkflowRuntime any Workflow services (components inherited from WorkflowRuntimeService base class) or External Data exchange services (components with ExternalDataExchange attribute).

Hope one finds that interesting … :)